Do YOU stress eat? Study uncovers how state of worry keeps brain rewards from food flowing even when you’re full
- Australian researchers carried out tests on stressed and non-stressed mice
- Revealed that stressed mice gained twice as much weight as the non-stressed
- READ MORE: Are you an emotional eater? The habit could be bad for your heart
Scientists have uncovered why we stress each – particularly on food like donuts, candies and chocolate bars.
Australian researchers said that when someone is full, an area of the brain activates to shut off reward signals from food, signaling them to stop eating.
But in experiments on stressed mice, the team found that this area remained silent — prompting the rodents to keep eating for pleasure. Those in the stressed group gained twice as much weight as mice in the non-stressed group.
The scientists said their study highlights the importance of sticking to a healthy diet, particularly when suffering from chronic stress.
Australian researchers warned that stress can drive comfort eating (stock image)
Dr Herbet Herzog, an eating disorders researcher at the Sydney-based Garvan Institute of Medical Research, said: ‘Our findings reveal stress can override a natural brain response that diminishes the pleasure gained from eating – meaning the brain is continuously rewarded for eating.
‘We showed that chronic stress, combined with a high-calorie diet, can drive more and more food intake as well as a preference for sweet, highly palatable food, thereby promoting weight gain and obesity.
‘This research highlights how crucial a healthy diet is during times of stress.’
In the study, published today in the journal Neuron, scientists split mice into two groups and monitored how much food they consumed.
Each was offered the same high-fat diet for a short period and could eat as much as they wanted.
One group of mice was kept in laboratory conditions, while the other was subjected to chronic stress.
Scientists did not say how this was achieved, but in previous cases, it has involved suspending mice from their tails for a protracted period until they stop struggling. This is repeated to trigger chronic stress.
Researchers found that the mice in the stressed group gained twice as much weight as the mice on the same diet who were not stressed.
Emotional eating might be bad for your heart, scientists say
Emotional eating could be bad for your heart health in the long run, researchers have warned
Tests revealed that an area of the brain known as the lateral habenula, which is located next to the thalamus, would remain silent when the mice were stressed.
In the non-stressed mice, this area switched on once they were full, signaling them to stop eating.
But for those chronically stressed, the area did not become activated by satiety, prompting them to continue eating.
Scientists also performed a ‘sucralose preference test’ to firm up the results.
This was when the mice were offered two options, either drinking water or water that had been artificially sweetened.
They found that the stressed mice consumed three times more sucralose than those on a high-fat diet alone.
The researchers said that at the center of this response was a molecule called NPY, which the brain naturally produces in response to stress.
When researchers blocked NPY in stressed mice on a high-fat diet, the mice consumed less comfort food and gained less weight.
Dr Herzog added: ‘In stressful situations, it’s easy to use a lot of energy and the feeling of reward can calm you down.
‘This is when a boost of energy through food is useful.
‘But, when experienced over long periods of time, stress appears to change the equation, driving eating that is bad for the body long term.’
He added: ‘This research emphasizes just how much stress can compromise a healthy energy metabolism.
‘It’s a reminder to avoid a stressful lifestyle, and crucially — if you are dealing with long-term stress — try to eat a healthy diet and lock away the junk food.’
Scientists did not consider other factors that could also be driving the stressed eating in mice, such as a disrupted sleep schedule.
It was unclear whether the results of these experiments in mice were directly translatable to humans.
The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia funded the research.
Source: Read Full Article